DR Laverty on Ramblings Yuppiez on Ramblings Ramblings – Re… on Ramblings Coincidences? | Real… on Coincidences? paul wrest on Peter Steen. Innocent?
- May 2017
- August 2016
- May 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- June 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
@darrenlavertyxSat:5pm - 1am
Follow me on TwitterMy Tweets
This is one of the VIP/Exaro fluzees trying to get attention. Piss myself over and over. She’s not even a victim of abuse as far as the law is concerned.
The ongoing antics of the usual suspects towards Darren Laverty’s crowdfunding efforts for his legal costs have taken an interesting turn.
In a very thinly veiled attempt to detail Mr Laverty’s efforts … the Sith Apprentice appealed on her timeline last week for legal assistance…
This was the convo.
Except for the Sith Apprentice’s legal “expert”… “Champerty” has not been a crime or civil tort since 1967’s Criminal Law Act.
Bribery however is a crime.
The abolition of criminal and civil liability under the law of England and Wales for maintenance and champerty shall not affect any rule of that law as to the cases in which a contract is to be treated as contrary to public policy or otherwise illegal.
Crowdfunding legal actions is not illegal.
Indeed if it was sites like this : https://www.crowdjustice.co.uk/ would not exist.
Especially if there is no intent to share the proceeds…
View original post 55 more words
Please share this appeal and help me fight for justice. Enough is enough.
FOR DECADES North Wales Police have been accused of covering up a child abuse scandal.
Critics say the force failed to investigate allegations that residents of care homes were being sexually abused in the 1970s and 1980s.
Britain’s only child abuse inquiry — the 1996 Waterhouse Tribunal — was set up to examine these claims.
The Tribunal gave the force a clean bill of health:
“ … there was no significant omission by the North Wales Police in investigating the complaints of abuse to children in care.”
Rebecca has long argued this conclusion is suspect.
The Tribunal did not consider the testimony of a witness who claimed he reported the most serious abuser in the scandal — John Allen — to police in 1980.
This was 15 years before Allen was gaoled.
In 2012 David Cameron ordered two new inquiries into the scandal.
One was a police investigation, Operation Pallial: the…
View original post 2,930 more words